Why Food Labels Protein Numbers Might Be Misleading
Share
If you've ever looked at the nutrition label on a food package and assumed the “protein” number was accurate, you're not alone. But recent research shows that these numbers might be off – sometimes by a lot. Here's why that matters and what can be done about it.
How Is Protein Usually Measured?
Most food labels calculate protein based on the amount of nitrogen in the food. This method assumes that all nitrogen comes from protein, and it uses a simple formula: nitrogen content × 6.25 = protein. This is called the “crude protein” value.
This method was developed in the 1800s and is still widely used today. It's quick and cheap, but it can be misleading.
What’s the Problem With This Method?
Not all nitrogen in food comes from protein. Foods also contain other nitrogen-rich substances that aren’t protein, like urea, ammonia, and some vitamins. These are called “non-protein nitrogen” or NPN. Because the crude protein method includes NPN, it often overestimates the actual amount of usable protein.
For example, plant-based foods like cereals and legumes can have up to 20 percent more “protein” on the label than they actually provide to your body.
Why Accurate Protein Data Matters
You might wonder if this really matters. It does. Protein values are used in:
- Diet planning and nutrition research
- Food labeling and health claims
- Economic decisions in the food industry
If the values are wrong, it could affect dietary recommendations, food marketing, and even what consumers choose to buy.
What’s a Better Way to Measure Protein?
The most accurate method is to break the food down and measure all the amino acids – the building blocks of protein. This gives a clearer picture of how much real, usable protein is in a food item.
However, this method is time-consuming and expensive, so it’s not practical for routine use in food labeling.
Another approach is to use updated “conversion factors” that are specific to each food. Instead of always using 6.25, we might use 5.5 for wheat or 5.6 for fish, depending on how much true protein they actually contain.
What Should Count as Protein?
Researchers recommend that the definition of protein should include:
- Amino acids
- Small peptides (short chains of amino acids)
- Free amino acids added to foods
But it should not include:
- Non-protein nitrogen (NPN)
- Prosthetic groups (non-protein parts attached to proteins)
- Rare amino acids that don’t contribute much to nutrition
What Does This Mean for Food Labels?
Right now, most food labels still use the old method. But experts suggest a two-part solution:
- Keep the current method for legal purposes (like labeling laws).
- Add a new, more accurate value using updated methods for researchers and professionals.
This way, everyday shoppers can still compare products easily, but nutritionists and scientists can use better data when it matters most.
How Would This Affect You?
For most people, it won’t change your daily eating habits overnight. But if you're someone who:
- Tracks your protein intake
- Eats a plant-based or vegetarian diet
- Relies on protein supplements or fortified foods
then these changes could help you understand your true protein intake more clearly.
In the long run, better data means better public health guidelines, more honest labeling, and smarter food choices.
The Bottom Line
The way we measure protein in foods is outdated and often inaccurate. While the crude protein method is easy, it doesn’t tell the full story. Researchers now call for updated methods that reflect the real nutritional value of protein.
So the next time you read a food label, remember – that protein number might not be telling the whole truth. Change is on the horizon, and it could lead to better nutrition for everyone.