EMS vs Traditional Resistance Training
Share
If you want to get stronger, lose fat, and improve your fitness, you’ve probably heard of traditional weight training. But what about electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) workouts? A recent 20-week study compared these two methods in healthy, active adults to see which one is more effective. The results give useful insights for anyone trying to choose the right training style.
What is EMS Training?
EMS training uses electrical impulses to make your muscles contract. You wear a suit or pads connected to a device, and these send signals directly to your muscles. The workout usually lasts around 20–25 minutes and is done twice a week. The idea is to stimulate many muscle groups at once, making it a time-efficient alternative to long gym sessions.
What is Traditional Resistance Training?
This is the classic approach: lifting weights, using machines, or doing bodyweight exercises. In the study, participants did 90-minute full-body sessions twice a week. They trained with progressive overload, gradually increasing weight and adjusting reps to build strength and muscle.
The Study Setup
Researchers randomly assigned 46 active adults to two groups: EMS or traditional resistance training (TradRT). Both groups trained twice a week for 20 weeks. The EMS group had 25-minute sessions. The TradRT group had 90-minute sessions. No strict diet plan was given, but participants kept their eating habits stable.
Measurements were taken at the start, halfway (10 weeks), and at the end (20 weeks). The researchers tracked:
- Body weight
- Body mass index (BMI)
- Body fat percentage
- Strength in key exercises like bench press, leg press, and shoulder press
Body Composition Results
Both methods improved body composition, but in different ways:
- EMS group: Lost more overall weight and had bigger drops in BMI
- TradRT group: Lost more body fat percentage
This means EMS might be better if your goal is to lower your weight quickly, while traditional training may be better for reducing fat while building muscle.
Strength Results
Both groups got stronger, but traditional resistance training had the edge:
- TradRT group had bigger gains in most strength tests, including bench press, leg press, and shoulder press
- EMS group also improved in all exercises, but not as much as the TradRT group
- Biceps curl strength was similar in both groups
This shows that while EMS can improve strength, especially for beginners or those with limited training options, traditional training is still the gold standard for maximum strength gains.
Why the Differences?
Traditional resistance training uses progressive overload with free weights or machines, which creates high mechanical stress on muscles. This promotes muscle growth, increases strength, and burns calories even after the workout.
EMS activates muscles in a different way—using electrical signals instead of voluntary movement. It can stimulate deep muscle fibers and be intense, but it’s mostly isometric (no joint movement) and doesn’t create the same mechanical load. This may limit long-term strength and hypertrophy compared to lifting weights.
Practical Takeaways
- If you want maximum strength and fat loss: Choose traditional resistance training
- If you have limited time or joint issues: EMS can be a useful alternative
- For the best of both worlds: Combining EMS and traditional training might give the most complete results (though this wasn’t tested in the study)
- Don’t skip progression: Whether using EMS or weights, gradually increase the intensity to keep improving
- Consider accessibility: EMS requires special equipment and trained supervision, while traditional training can be done in most gyms or even at home with basic equipment
Who Might Prefer EMS?
EMS may suit people who:
- Are short on time but want a full-body workout
- Can’t lift heavy weights due to injury or mobility issues
- Want to add variety to their fitness routine
Who Might Prefer Traditional Training?
Traditional training may be better for:
- Athletes wanting peak strength performance
- People aiming for significant muscle growth
- Those who enjoy lifting and gym workouts
Final Word
The study shows that both EMS and traditional resistance training can improve strength and body composition in just 20 weeks. EMS is time-efficient and effective, especially for weight and BMI reduction. Traditional resistance training is more effective for building strength and losing fat. Your choice depends on your goals, time, and physical condition.
If you have access to both, consider alternating or combining them to maximize results. And no matter the method, consistency is key.